Finite Element Analysis of Fluid Flow through a Porous Scaffold in a Perfusion Bioreactor

Document Type : Research Article


Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran


The dynamic physical environment and geometric architecture required for tissue engineering can be achieved by combining tissue engineering scaffold and biological reactors. These bioreactors are used to perform mechanical stimulation on cells to create tissue. These cells are planted on the surface of the scaffold. In this system, the amount and distribution of mechanical stimulation applied to cells depend on the scaffold’s microstructure. The geometry of the designed scaffold depends on two independent parameters. By changing these independent parameters, three scaffolds with different porosity are created. A flow rate of 0.05 ml/min has been used to perfuse the bioreactor. Simulations performed under steady-state conditions using continuity and Navier-Stokes equations. Based on the results, there was an increase in flow within the scaffold with the lowest porosity up to 10 times. The maximum wall shear stress and flow velocity were observed in the scaffold with the lowest porosity. The maximum wall shear stress on the scaffold with the highest porosity was 4.95×10-7 kPa. According to the findings, in order to apply the appropriate shear stress on cells and maintain a uniform pressure gradient across the scaffold, porosity can be increased to some extent that does not damage the ideal surface area to volume ratio.


Main Subjects

  1. Martin, D. Wendt, M. Heberer, The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering, Trends Biotechnol, 22(2) (2004) 8086.
  2. Meyer, A. Buchter, N. Nazer, H.P. Wiesmann, Design and performance of a bioreactor system for mechanically promoted three-dimensional tissue engineering, Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 44(2) (2006) 134-140.
  3. Bakhshian Nik, B. Vahidi, Simulation of the Effects of Shear Flow of the Culture Medium Fluid on Stem Cells using the Scaffolds of Hard Tissue Engineering, Modares Journal of Biotechnology, 10(4) (2019) 635-646.
  4. Cheng, Z. Schwartz, A. Kahn, X. Li, Z. Shao, M. Sun, Y. Ao, B.D. Boyan, H. Chen, Advances in Porous Scaffold Design for Bone and Cartilage Tissue Engineering and Regeneration, Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, 25(1) (2018) 14-29.
  5. H. Cartmell, B.D. Porter, A.J. Garcia, R.E. Guldberg, Effects of medium perfusion rate on cell-seeded threedimensional bone constructs in vitro, Tissue Eng, 9(6) (2003) 1197-1203.
  6. Theodoridis, E. Aggelidou, M. Manthou, E. Demiri, A. Bakopoulou, A. Kritis, Assessment of cartilage regeneration on 3D collagen-polycaprolactone scaffolds: Evaluation of growth media in static and in perfusion bioreactor dynamic culture, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 183 (2019) 110403.
  7. R. Hassan, Y.-X. Qin, D.E. Komatsu, S.M.Z. Uddin, Utilization of Finite Element Analysis for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering, Materials (Basel), 12(20) (2019) 3331.
  8. Moradkhani, B. Vahidi, Effect of Collagen Substrate Stiffness and Thickness on the response of a Mesenchymal Stem Cell in Cell Culture Environment: A Computational Study, Iranian Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 9(2) (2015) 179-190.
  9. Cioffi, F. Boschetti, M.T. Raimondi, G. Dubini, Modeling evaluation of the fluid-dynamic microenvironment in tissue-engineered constructs: a micro-CT based model, Biotechnol Bioeng, 93(3) (2006) 500-510.
  10. Yan, X. Chen, D.J. Bergstrom, Modeling of the Flow within Scaffolds in Perfusion Bioreactors, American Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1 (2012) 72-77.
  11. Malvè, D.J. Bergstrom, X.B. Chen, Modeling the flow and mass transport in a mechanically stimulated parametric porous scaffold under fluid-structure interaction approach, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 96 (2018) 53-60.
  12. M. Gharravi, M. Orazizadeh, M. Hashemitabar, Fluidinduced low shear stress improves cartilage like tissue fabrication by encapsulating chondrocytes, Cell and Tissue Banking, 17(1) (2016) 117-122.
  13. Boschetti, M.T. Raimondi, F. Migliavacca, G. Dubini, Prediction of the micro-fluid dynamic environment imposed to three-dimensional engineered cell systems in bioreactors, J Biomech, 39(3) (2006) 418-425.
  14. Campos Marin, T. Grossi, E. Bianchi, G. Dubini, D. Lacroix, 2D µ-Particle Image Velocimetry and Computational Fluid Dynamics Study Within a 3D Porous Scaffold, Ann Biomed Eng, 45(5) (2017) 1341-1351.
  15. Campos Marin, D. Lacroix, The inter-sample structural variability of regular tissue-engineered scaffolds significantly affects the micromechanical local cell environment, Interface Focus, 5(2) (2015) 20140097.
  16. C. Marin, T. Grossi, E. Bianchi, G. Dubini, D. Lacroix, micro-Particle tracking velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics study of cell seeding within a 3D porous scaffold, J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 75 (2017) 463469.
  17. A. Chung, C.P. Chen, T.H. Lin, C.S. Tseng, A compact computational model for cell construct development in perfusion culture, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 99(6) (2008) 1535-1541.
  18. Cioffi, J. Kuffer, S. Strobel, G. Dubini, I. Martin, D. Wendt, Computational evaluation of oxygen and shear stress distributions in 3D perfusion culture systems: macro-scale and micro-structured models, J Biomech, 41(14) (2008) 2918-2925.
  19. Ferroni, S. Giusti, D. Nascimento, A. Silva, F. Boschetti, A. Ahluwalia, Modeling the fluid-dynamics and oxygen consumption in a porous scaffold stimulated by cyclic squeeze pressure, Med Eng Phys, 38(8) (2016) 725-732.
  20. J. Grodzinsky, M.E. Levenston, M. Jin, E.H. Frank, Cartilage tissue remodeling in response to mechanical forces, Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 2 (2000) 691-713.
  21. B. Chen, M.G. Li, H. Ke, Modeling of the Flow Rate in the Dispensing-Based Process for Fabricating Tissue Scaffolds, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 130(2) (2008).
  22. G. Li, X.Y. Tian, X.B. Chen, Modeling of Flow Rate, Pore Size, and Porosity for the Dispensing-Based Tissue Scaffolds Fabrication, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 131(3) (2009).
  23. K. Batchelor, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
  24. Sandino, J.A. Planell, D. Lacroix, A finite element study of mechanical stimuli in scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, Journal of Biomechanics, 41(5) (2008) 1005-1014.
  25. Frontiers in Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Research, 2017.
  26. COMSOL Multiphysics®, v. 5.5.( COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
  27. Mesallati, C.T. Buckley, T. Nagel, D.J. Kelly, Scaffold architecture determines chondrocyte response to externally applied dynamic compression, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 12(5) (2013) 889-899.
  28. T. Podichetty, P.R. Bhaskar, A. Khalf, S.V. Madihally, Modeling pressure drop using generalized scaffold characteristics in an axial-flow bioreactor for soft tissue regeneration, Ann Biomed Eng, 42(6) (2014) 1319-1330.
  29. Design and Development of Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Using Three-Dimensional Printing for Bio-Based Applications, 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 3(2) (2016) 119-127.
  30. Balko, J.F. Weber, S.D. Waldman, Mechanical Stimulation Methods for Cartilage Tissue Engineering, in: B. Li, T. Webster (Eds.) Orthopedic Biomaterials : Progress in Biology, Manufacturing, and Industry Perspectives, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018, pp. 123-147.